<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>full text</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>full text</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>0</FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17315</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>aaaa</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">aaaa</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">aaa</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17315_b81c21c91a6a8edb733b392c9604bf2c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Validity of the Draw A Story Test in Two Groups of Aggressive and Withdrawn Children</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Validity of the Draw A Story Test in Two Groups of Aggressive and Withdrawn Children</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>16</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17308</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F</FirstName>
					<LastName>Chamandar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Children with Special Needs, Shiraz University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahim</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Education and School of Psychology, Shiraz University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mazidy</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of History and Philosophy of Education, Shiraz University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>D</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sief</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology, Shiraz University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Assessment of validity of the Draw A Story test was the aim of this study. The sample consisted of 137 elementary students (53 girls and 84 boys) recruited from fourth and fifth grades, and were categorized into two groups of aggressive and withdrawn based on assessments. They were given the Draw A Story test (DAS). According to the results, the differences between the two groups were significant for self image (p&lt;.04) and non significant for the emotional content of DAS. The aggressive group showed stronger self image in comparison to the other group. Aggressive boys showed a stronger self image while the withdrawn children showed a weaker self image (p&lt;.04). Aggressive and withdrawn girls had higher mean scores in the emotional content than boys, whereas the aggressive boys showed a weaker emotional content (p&lt;.02). The range of positive to negative response frequencies were significantly different for both groups and both groups had the highest response frequency in emotional content in the range of moderately negative. The range of self image response frequencies in the aggressive group was significantly different and positive response had the highest frequency. The range of self image response frequencies in the withdrawn children was significantly different, and the unpleasant and negative responses had the highest frequency. Content analysis of the aggressive stories showed a high engagement ratio of aggression components with the highest frequency of murdering and killing imageries, while in the withdrawn children content analysis indicated the high engagement ratio with the highest frequency of components such as loneliness, fear and anxiety. These results indicate that Draw a Story Test is a valid instrument for discriminating aggressive and withdrawn children from normal subjects.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Assessment of validity of the Draw A Story test was the aim of this study. The sample consisted of 137 elementary students (53 girls and 84 boys) recruited from fourth and fifth grades, and were categorized into two groups of aggressive and withdrawn based on assessments. They were given the Draw A Story test (DAS). According to the results, the differences between the two groups were significant for self image (p&lt;.04) and non significant for the emotional content of DAS. The aggressive group showed stronger self image in comparison to the other group. Aggressive boys showed a stronger self image while the withdrawn children showed a weaker self image (p&lt;.04). Aggressive and withdrawn girls had higher mean scores in the emotional content than boys, whereas the aggressive boys showed a weaker emotional content (p&lt;.02). The range of positive to negative response frequencies were significantly different for both groups and both groups had the highest response frequency in emotional content in the range of moderately negative. The range of self image response frequencies in the aggressive group was significantly different and positive response had the highest frequency. The range of self image response frequencies in the withdrawn children was significantly different, and the unpleasant and negative responses had the highest frequency. Content analysis of the aggressive stories showed a high engagement ratio of aggression components with the highest frequency of murdering and killing imageries, while in the withdrawn children content analysis indicated the high engagement ratio with the highest frequency of components such as loneliness, fear and anxiety. These results indicate that Draw a Story Test is a valid instrument for discriminating aggressive and withdrawn children from normal subjects.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">aggressivechildren</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">withdrawn achildren</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Draw a Story Test</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">validity</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17308_b428cfbca7376879e64c87004872d614.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship between Coping Styles and Adolescents' Depression</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Relationship between Coping Styles and Adolescents&#039; Depression</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>17</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>26</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17309</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S</FirstName>
					<LastName>Faramarzi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Children with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M. R</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abedi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Consultation, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Karimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Pasychology, Islamic Azad University– Branch of Isfahan Khorasgan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The purpose of this study was to detemine the relationship between coping styles and adolescents&#039; depression.  Participants were 341 high school students (170 boys &amp; 171 girls) in Lordegan city who were randomly selected. All participants were asked to complete the Frydenberg &amp; Lewis Adolescent Coping Scale, Beck Depression Scale, and the demographic researcher made questionnaire. The results showed that girls&#039; mean depression scores was higher than that of boys. Problem focused and emotion focused coping styles were negatively correlated to depression (p &lt; 0.001). The correlation between boys’ non productive coping styles and their depression was not significant. The results of the study revealed that problem focused coping style and emotion focused coping style, but not non productive coping style predicted depression. These results suggest that using problem focused coping style and emotion focused coping style is associated with decrease in adolescents&#039; depression.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The purpose of this study was to detemine the relationship between coping styles and adolescents&#039; depression.  Participants were 341 high school students (170 boys &amp; 171 girls) in Lordegan city who were randomly selected. All participants were asked to complete the Frydenberg &amp; Lewis Adolescent Coping Scale, Beck Depression Scale, and the demographic researcher made questionnaire. The results showed that girls&#039; mean depression scores was higher than that of boys. Problem focused and emotion focused coping styles were negatively correlated to depression (p &lt; 0.001). The correlation between boys’ non productive coping styles and their depression was not significant. The results of the study revealed that problem focused coping style and emotion focused coping style, but not non productive coping style predicted depression. These results suggest that using problem focused coping style and emotion focused coping style is associated with decrease in adolescents&#039; depression.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">coping styles</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">depression</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">adolescents</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17309_65811f7fea29975f1d0fa5655b8d5403.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effectiveness of Group Contracting and Behavioral Activation Therapy with and without Family Support on Marital Stress in Coronary Heart Disease</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Effectiveness of Group Contracting and Behavioral Activation Therapy with and without Family Support on Marital Stress in Coronary Heart Disease</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>27</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>40</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17310</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>I</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahimian. Boogar</LastName>
<Affiliation>semnan universityAssistant Professor of clinical psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Najafi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of clinical psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Z</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghaem-magham Farahani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Clinical Sciences, welfare sciences and rehabilitation University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dabiri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D student of educational psychology, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Marital stress is an important issue associated with incidence and maintenance of coronary heart disease and adverse consequences of this disease.This research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of group contracting and behavioral activation therapy with and without family support on marital stress in coronary heart disease patients (CHD). &lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;In the Quasi-experimental design, fifty nine married male  coronary heart patients were selected  and randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. Participants completed Stockholm-Tehran Marital Stress Scale (STMSS), Social Support Questionnaire and a demographic questionnaire as the pretest, posttest and follow up. The treatment groups only received therapeutic intervention in 7 sessions (once weekly) and 6 month later were followed up. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in marital stress among contracting and behavioral activation therapy group, contracting and behavioral activation therapy group  with family support, and the control group (P&lt;0/001). It was concluded that clinicians can use this therapy for the reduction of marital stress in patients with coronary heart disease as a means of quality of life promotion and recovery from the disease.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Marital stress is an important issue associated with incidence and maintenance of coronary heart disease and adverse consequences of this disease.This research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of group contracting and behavioral activation therapy with and without family support on marital stress in coronary heart disease patients (CHD). &lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;In the Quasi-experimental design, fifty nine married male  coronary heart patients were selected  and randomly assigned to two experimental and control groups. Participants completed Stockholm-Tehran Marital Stress Scale (STMSS), Social Support Questionnaire and a demographic questionnaire as the pretest, posttest and follow up. The treatment groups only received therapeutic intervention in 7 sessions (once weekly) and 6 month later were followed up. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in marital stress among contracting and behavioral activation therapy group, contracting and behavioral activation therapy group  with family support, and the control group (P&lt;0/001). It was concluded that clinicians can use this therapy for the reduction of marital stress in patients with coronary heart disease as a means of quality of life promotion and recovery from the disease.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">behavioral activation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">family support</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">marital stress</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">coronary heart disease</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17310_f95b892019a297e393694d82d0fa63d4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Validity, Reliability, and Factor Structure of Carver, Scheier and Weinteraub's Coping Operations Preference Enquiry (COPE) in University of Isfahan Students</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Validity, Reliability, and Factor Structure of Carver, Scheier and Weinteraub&#039;s Coping Operations Preference Enquiry (COPE) in University of Isfahan Students</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>41</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>54</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17313</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>R</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jalalinezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Clinical Psychology, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yazdkhasti</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Clinical Psychology, University of Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>A</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abedi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Children with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Normal &lt;br /&gt; 0 &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; false &lt;br /&gt; false &lt;br /&gt; false &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; EN-US &lt;br /&gt; X-NONE &lt;br /&gt; FA &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; /* Style Definitions */ &lt;br /&gt; table.MsoNormalTable &lt;br /&gt; {mso-style-name:&quot;Table Normal&quot; &lt;br /&gt; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0 &lt;br /&gt; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0 &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-noshow:yes &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-priority:99 &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-qformat:yes &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot; &lt;br /&gt; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt &lt;br /&gt; mso-para-margin:0cm &lt;br /&gt; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt &lt;br /&gt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan &lt;br /&gt; font-size:10.0pt &lt;br /&gt; font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;} &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The purpose of this research was to determine &lt;br /&gt;validity, reliability and factor structure of Coping Preference Enquiry. &lt;br /&gt;Therefore a group of 240 Universit of Isfahan students (168 females and 72 &lt;br /&gt;males) were randomly selected as the statistical sample. The instrument of the &lt;br /&gt;research was Carver, Scheier and Weinterub&#039;s Coping Preference Enquiry. To &lt;br /&gt;assess reliability, Chronbach&#039;s alpha was computed, and to assess construct &lt;br /&gt;validity, exploratory factor analysis and the item-total correlation within &lt;br /&gt;each subscale was calculated. Using varimax rotation five factors were obtained &lt;br /&gt;which were named: 1) cognitive- approach coping 2) behavioral- approach coping &lt;br /&gt;3) emotional- approach coping 4) cognitive- avoidance coping 5) behavioral- &lt;br /&gt;avoidance coping. Overall, the results showed the above validity and &lt;br /&gt;reliability in the population of the students of Isfahan University.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Normal &lt;br /&gt; 0 &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; false &lt;br /&gt; false &lt;br /&gt; false &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; EN-US &lt;br /&gt; X-NONE &lt;br /&gt; FA &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; /* Style Definitions */ &lt;br /&gt; table.MsoNormalTable &lt;br /&gt; {mso-style-name:&quot;Table Normal&quot; &lt;br /&gt; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0 &lt;br /&gt; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0 &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-noshow:yes &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-priority:99 &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-qformat:yes &lt;br /&gt; mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot; &lt;br /&gt; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt &lt;br /&gt; mso-para-margin:0cm &lt;br /&gt; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt &lt;br /&gt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan &lt;br /&gt; font-size:10.0pt &lt;br /&gt; font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;} &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The purpose of this research was to determine &lt;br /&gt;validity, reliability and factor structure of Coping Preference Enquiry. &lt;br /&gt;Therefore a group of 240 Universit of Isfahan students (168 females and 72 &lt;br /&gt;males) were randomly selected as the statistical sample. The instrument of the &lt;br /&gt;research was Carver, Scheier and Weinterub&#039;s Coping Preference Enquiry. To &lt;br /&gt;assess reliability, Chronbach&#039;s alpha was computed, and to assess construct &lt;br /&gt;validity, exploratory factor analysis and the item-total correlation within &lt;br /&gt;each subscale was calculated. Using varimax rotation five factors were obtained &lt;br /&gt;which were named: 1) cognitive- approach coping 2) behavioral- approach coping &lt;br /&gt;3) emotional- approach coping 4) cognitive- avoidance coping 5) behavioral- &lt;br /&gt;avoidance coping. Overall, the results showed the above validity and &lt;br /&gt;reliability in the population of the students of Isfahan University.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Coping Operations Preference Enquiry (COPE)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">coping with stress</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reliability and validity of coping with stress</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17313_94f36ec487f477e4a105ef4397374519.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship of the Meta-Cognitive Beliefs with Social Anxiety Symptoms (Avoidance, Fear and Physiological Arousal) in Non-Clinical Population</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Relationship of the Meta-Cognitive Beliefs with Social Anxiety Symptoms (Avoidance, Fear and Physiological Arousal) in Non-Clinical Population</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>55</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>70</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17312</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hassanvand Amouzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor of Psychology of Payam Noor University, Tehran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rasoul</FirstName>
					<LastName>Roshan Chesly</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of Psychology, Tehran Shahed University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hassanvand Amouzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.D. Specialist in Pediatrics, Medical Science of Kurdistan University, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of meta-cognitivebeliefs with social anxiety symptoms in non-clinical population. The sample consisted of 300 (166 females and 134 males) Ilam University students who selected by cluster sampling method. The participants completed the Meta-Cognations Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) and Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). The results showed that meta-cognitive beliefs were positively correlated with social anxiety symptoms (P&lt;0.05). Also, the results of regression analysis of MCQ-30 subscales showed that uncontrollability danger and cognitive self– consciousness are predictors of avoidance, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thought and danger are predictors of fear, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thought and danger and positive beliefs about worry and cognitive security are predictors of physiological arousal. These were the significant predictors of social anxiety symptoms (P≤0.05). Results of this study support the meta- cognitive Wells and Matthew&#039;s model of social anxiety and indicates that meta-cognitive beliefs have an important role in social anxiety symptoms. Therefore, the modification of meta- cognitive beliefs with regard to the importance of their role in avoidance, fear and physiological arousal, can be a preventative factor in intensification and continuity of social anxiety symptoms.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of meta-cognitivebeliefs with social anxiety symptoms in non-clinical population. The sample consisted of 300 (166 females and 134 males) Ilam University students who selected by cluster sampling method. The participants completed the Meta-Cognations Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) and Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). The results showed that meta-cognitive beliefs were positively correlated with social anxiety symptoms (P&lt;0.05). Also, the results of regression analysis of MCQ-30 subscales showed that uncontrollability danger and cognitive self– consciousness are predictors of avoidance, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thought and danger are predictors of fear, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thought and danger and positive beliefs about worry and cognitive security are predictors of physiological arousal. These were the significant predictors of social anxiety symptoms (P≤0.05). Results of this study support the meta- cognitive Wells and Matthew&#039;s model of social anxiety and indicates that meta-cognitive beliefs have an important role in social anxiety symptoms. Therefore, the modification of meta- cognitive beliefs with regard to the importance of their role in avoidance, fear and physiological arousal, can be a preventative factor in intensification and continuity of social anxiety symptoms.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">meta</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">meta-cognitive beliefs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cognitive beliefs</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">avoidance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">fear</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">physiological arousal</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17312_09ab29d3e07385a0af1ab7148d620177.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Effect of Transactional Analysis Training on Love Styles of Couples</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Effect of Transactional Analysis Training on Love Styles of Couples</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>71</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>84</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17314</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S. A</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bahrami</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>O</FirstName>
					<LastName>Etemadi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Normal
  0
  
  
  
  
  false
  false
  false
  
  EN-US
  X-NONE
  FA
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 


 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:&quot;Table Normal&quot;
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0
	mso-style-noshow:yes
	mso-style-priority:99
	mso-style-qformat:yes
	mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot;
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt
	mso-para-margin:0cm
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan
	font-size:10.0pt
	font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;}



The
purpose of this study was to examine the effect of transactional analysis
training on love styles of couples in Khoram- abad. It was a quasi-experimental
design with pre and post-tests and a control group. The population was the
couples who referred to counseling centers in Khoram- abad in 2008-2009. The
sample consisted of 30 couples (60 persons) who were randomly selected, and
assigned to two experimental and control groups. The couples in the
experimental group received transactional analysis training, and at the end,
both groups took a post-test. Leeâs love styles questionnaire was used as the
measuring instrument. The results of analysis of covariance showed that
transactional analysis training significantly affected eros, storge, pragma,
mania and agape love styles (p0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that
transactional analysis training seems to be able to improve eros, storge,
pragma, mania and agape love styles of the couples. 

Â </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Normal
  0
  
  
  
  
  false
  false
  false
  
  EN-US
  X-NONE
  FA
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 


 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:&quot;Table Normal&quot;
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0
	mso-style-noshow:yes
	mso-style-priority:99
	mso-style-qformat:yes
	mso-style-parent:&quot;&quot;
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt
	mso-para-margin:0cm
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan
	font-size:10.0pt
	font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;}



The
purpose of this study was to examine the effect of transactional analysis
training on love styles of couples in Khoram- abad. It was a quasi-experimental
design with pre and post-tests and a control group. The population was the
couples who referred to counseling centers in Khoram- abad in 2008-2009. The
sample consisted of 30 couples (60 persons) who were randomly selected, and
assigned to two experimental and control groups. The couples in the
experimental group received transactional analysis training, and at the end,
both groups took a post-test. Leeâs love styles questionnaire was used as the
measuring instrument. The results of analysis of covariance showed that
transactional analysis training significantly affected eros, storge, pragma,
mania and agape love styles (p0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that
transactional analysis training seems to be able to improve eros, storge,
pragma, mania and agape love styles of the couples. 

Â </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">love styles</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">transactional analysis</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">couples training</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17314_b2ca44a0b3ffb58e47f4b576816cdfa2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7642</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship of Behavioral Activation and Inhibition Systems (BAS/BIS), Difficulty of Emotional Regulation, Metacognition with Worry</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Relationship of Behavioral Activation and Inhibition Systems (BAS/BIS), Difficulty of Emotional Regulation, Metacognition with Worry</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>85</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>100</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17311</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soltan Mohammadlou</LastName>
<Affiliation>Master of Clinical Psychology, Tehran psychiatry institute, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>B</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gharraee</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD of Clinical Psychology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>F</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fathali Lvasani</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD of Clinical Psychology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gohari</LastName>
<Affiliation>hD of Biological Statistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Worry is a popular phenomenon and a common feature of many disorders, especially anxiety disorders. The objective of the study was to predict worry by using three predictive factors related to biological, emotional and cognition areas. In this study, behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation system, difficulties in emotion regulation and metacognition were examined as predictive variables. In a correlation cross-sectional design, 234 Medical Group students [BA and MA] of Tehran University of Medical Sciences participated in this study by using cluster sampling. The students completed these scales: Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems (BAS/BIS), Difficulty of Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Behavioral inhibition system, difficulty of emotion rgulation and metacognition variables were significantly positively correlated with worry (P&lt;0/0 1(. Behavioral activation system variable was not significantly associated with worry. Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated a predictive model for worry in which behavioral inhibition system, difficulty of emotional regulation and metacognition were its components respectively. Behavioral activation system was not included in the model. The findings of this study that worry should be studied in different biological, emotional, and metacognitive aspects. The results also emphasize the role of behavioral inhibition system as a temperamental and biological factor in psychopathology of worry in adult population.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Worry is a popular phenomenon and a common feature of many disorders, especially anxiety disorders. The objective of the study was to predict worry by using three predictive factors related to biological, emotional and cognition areas. In this study, behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation system, difficulties in emotion regulation and metacognition were examined as predictive variables. In a correlation cross-sectional design, 234 Medical Group students [BA and MA] of Tehran University of Medical Sciences participated in this study by using cluster sampling. The students completed these scales: Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems (BAS/BIS), Difficulty of Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). Behavioral inhibition system, difficulty of emotion rgulation and metacognition variables were significantly positively correlated with worry (P&lt;0/0 1(. Behavioral activation system variable was not significantly associated with worry. Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated a predictive model for worry in which behavioral inhibition system, difficulty of emotional regulation and metacognition were its components respectively. Behavioral activation system was not included in the model. The findings of this study that worry should be studied in different biological, emotional, and metacognitive aspects. The results also emphasize the role of behavioral inhibition system as a temperamental and biological factor in psychopathology of worry in adult population.
 
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Meta-cognition</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">worry</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Behavioral activation and inhibition systems</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">difficulty of emotion regulation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">meta</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cognition</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://cbs.ui.ac.ir/article_17311_5850d06f596fbfad48c4c25af506012e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
